Gary’s Note: Western governments are in deep fiscal trouble. In fact, they’re going bankrupt. America is in particularly dire straits because it could soon lose the luxury of paying back its debts in a currency it issues. Dan Denning reminds us that this sort of thing tends to lead to political and economic strife.

Are Western Governments Going Broke?

By Dan Denning
November 5, 2009
Melbourne, Australia

Are the Western Welfare States (the U.S., Japan, and EU nations) really going bankrupt? Things were headed that way before the credit crisis began. The Global Financial Crisis may be becoming a sovereign debt crisis and that will worsen an already bad situation.

First, let’s check out the chart below from the 2008 annual budget audit by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. It shows that the U.S. government must roll over $3.4 trillion in debt over the next four years. This $3.4 trillion does not include any additional borrowing that may be required for other government programs (wars, healthcare, wars, school lunches).

What’s the big deal? $3.4 trillion is a small number by today’s standards, isn’t it? Not exactly.

The chart shows how incredibly interest-rate sensitive U.S. government borrowing now is. Not only is it a big ask to ask the world’s creditors to continue funding such large deficits (there are only so many savings available to borrow, after all), but the interest expense on that debt is likely to go up as the fiscal position of America deteriorates.

And if America can’t find anyone willing to finance its deficits, what then? Well, the luxury of issuing debts in the currency you also print is that you can print money to pay for them. Technically, you can never become insolvent when you enjoy this privilege. The Fed, for example, can create new money to buy debt issued by the Treasury, funding deficits ad infinitum.

But this monetisation of the debt is another way of saying that international creditors are no longer willing to pick up America’s spending tab. They will be betting against the American economy, not on it. Even if the Fed takes the unusual step of moving out further along on the yield curve to set interest rates (and keep the bond vigilantes from sending yields to the moon) this is a clear signal to owners of dollar-denominated assets and holders of dollar currency reserves to get out.

Another scenario to watch for is when creditors begin asking the U.S. to issue debts in currencies other than its own (Yuan, Euros). That would be something. In the meantime, they will look to lessen their dollar reserves.

That may not be such an orderly process. And the urgency to get out of the greenback and into something better will only pick up pace as it becomes clear the politicians in America (along with the Fed) are not likely to suddenly rediscover fiscal prudence.

You never know. The Fed may assert its independence and baulk at more quantitative easing. But we wouldn’t count on it. And we reckon tangible assets and possibly emerging market equities would be the biggest beneficiaries of capital flows out of the dollar...and into anything else.

The next chart is for you, Paul Krugman. Krugman, among others, continues to insist that larger public sector deficits are necessary if the Western world is to avoid a Japanese-style deflationary “Lost Decade.” He claims the government must increase spending as households and businesses deleverage and reduce debts.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The Bailout Loophole!”

How Congressional Mandate HR-3221 Could Pay You Up To $17,500 This Year

Missed by millions of Americans, this little-known LEGAL “loophole” could easily pay you up to $17,500 in income this year and every year...

For as long as it takes this market and the US economy to recover!

Get all the details here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Advocates of this idea claim that public sector deficits, as a percentage of GDP, have no real limits. And the example they cite is Japan. As you can see from the chart below, Japan’s debt to GDP ratio is nearing 200%. America’s isn’t even half of that yet (it’s about 98%, or $13 trillion). If Japan can finance a deficit at 200% of GDP, then why are we worried that U.S. deficits half that size would threaten interest rates or the dollar?

First off, it’s worth pointing out that high public sector-debt-to GDP ratios haven’t worked in Japan, if by work you mean pave the way to a stable recovery. Advocates might say-as advocates of the stimulus here in Australia often say-that the public spending made things less worse. But the opposite is true. It’s made things more bad!

Or just worse, if you prefer. We mean that the public spending has done two things, neither of which is productive, and both of which, in fact, waste capital and resources. First, public sector spending to prop up financial firms with dodgy assets prevents the needed reckoning in asset prices that would produce market clearing prices for commercial and residential real estate. You get zombie banks and a zombie economy and zombie house prices.

Secondly, there’s no indication that all the infrastructure spending in Japan has produced any kind of lasting growth for the economy. It may have built some great roads and bridges. But we wonder if it solved any of the underlying problems? What’s more, the capital and resources that went into those projects was directed by political considerations and not available for the private sector, which could have put them to some use at least designed to produce a return on the capital.

The underlying problem which deficit spending does not solve is compounded by demographics. Japan’s government is hoping that continued borrowing can be financed at low rates by pensioners who will be cashing out of their pensions but seeking safety. However, we suspect that Japanese pensioners will begin to consume their savings as they downsize their lives into their twilight years (which tend to last much longer in Japan, as the number of Japanese centenarians shows).

That means interest on Japanese bonds-which already one fifth of the Japanese budget-will consume even more of the nation’s resources, if the older population clams up with its money. And like in the U.S., you’ll see the government borrowing more and more of every new yen spent, with more of that borrowed yen going to pay a previous creditor. That’s bordering on Ponzidom.

Japan has been able to run a higher-than-average public debt-to-GDP ratio because it has had such a high personal savings rates. This kept borrowing costs low for the government. But we’d expect that to change soon. A debt-to-GDP ratio of 200% will be very difficult to finance in the world as it is-much less in a world where those rates begin to rise and when Japanese savers begin to consume their savings.

Finally, what about Europe? Our argument here is simple: Europe’s monetary union is going to come unstuck. Why? Europe has one interest rate for twelve different economies. That does not leave national governments with the flexibility to print money and inflate away political problems. This will be intolerable, the monetary union will break up.

The sign to watch for is a spike in the yields on euro-denominated debt. As the chart below (from Stratfor) shows, earlier this year bond yields did in fact begin to widen. Germany Bunds have the most stable rates, as Germany has traditionally the most stable fiscal and monetary policies in Europe (they did not go hog wild for stimulus).

But for Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Italy and Austria (whose banks lent large for real estate in Eastern Europe), another round of falling asset values really would show that the GFC has become a sovereign debt crisis. And will Germany bail out these nations? Can it afford to?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Get Six FREE Picks Today — Double Your Money in 2009 Guaranteed!

I’ll send you six FREE penny stock picks and guarantee that at least one of them will double your money in 2009.

My scientific CXS Money-Multiplier just made my readers 47%, 61% and 279%...in a single month.

Click here and find out how you too can see triple-digit gains this year, guaranteed!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We don’t know the answer to those questions. But it is worth pointing out that by assuming or guaranteeing the liabilities of the financial sector, national governments have also assumed the risk. And the bond markets will be left to decide how to price this risk.

How it ends is anyone’s guess. But our take is that the Super Cycle in fiat money is at its peak. And as it unwinds, it’s going to take national governments and their financing model with it. They will be forced to adopt a new model and take a new form to survive.

This means a great deal of political and economic upheaval. It’s no coincidence that the last time the world faced such monetary upheaval was when it went off the gold standard and straight into essentially thirty-two years of military and economic conflict (1913-1945). If the world is about to become that disordered again, you’ll need a plan to deal with it.

Regards,
Dan Denning
www.dailyreckoning.com.au

Remember why we love gold, Shooters. Governments get into all kinds of mischief when the restraints of hard money are removed. Dan’s right; you need a plan for when the upheavals start.

You may want to consider doing what your Whiskey editor did; move.

Some places are going to fare better than others as life fractures and reorients itself in the U.S. Smaller towns with minimal urban sprawl and lots of agricultural hinterland (like Charlottesville!) seem a much better choice than overbuilt metropolitan statistical areas like New York and Boston and their surrounding suburbs.

I only got as far as Baltimore when I left New York…but I’m still keeping on my toes in case this city doesn’t transition that well. But heck, if Detroit can get moving in the right direction, then maybe this other contender for murder capitol can too.

I’m not suggesting you make off to Detroit just yet…but that burg is a bit ahead of the curve on the collapse. Its hypertrophied industrial incarnation died a while back. Now the remains can be scavenged and put to better use.

The Detroit-that-was was like a heavily scabbed wound. Now the healing is starting and soon that scabrous covering will flake away…

I got a few dozen letters about urban farming in Detroit…and I wish I could run them all!

I’m going to present a few of them both today and tomorrow, but I fear we may need a Weekend Edition to tackle them all in a timely manner, Shooters.

But let’s get to it. Here’s the first e-mail…

Wow.

To borrow a line from friend and contributor James Howard Kunstler, circumstances are going to force us to live differently…whether we like it or not. Those who refuse to adapt will be dealt by nature in the usual manner.

But then the responses turned very positive…

*******

*******

*******

*******

Indeed I will, Shooter! The disintegration and replacement of the industrial megacity is a pet concern of mine. Has been for years.

Thanks. And amen!

Thanks. I just had to send you all the actual article. I wanted to share the world as we see it from behind the Whiskey Bar.

This is the sort of local, need-driven change that I love. This isn’t the heavy hand of government deciding what’s best; this is the market undoing some horrible entrenchment.

Cheap energy, industrialism, urban sprawl, politics as religion, wealth redistribution schemes…it may be time for them all to go away.

Change is a-comin’…but some of it will be good. And those of us who accept and prepare will find ourselves leading different lives that we may actually enjoy more.

More of your letters tomorrow…

Regards,
Gary Gibson
Managing Editor, Whiskey & Gunpowder
gary@whiskeyandgunpowder.com